KOLLIED
← Portfolio

Thesis-fit βŸ‚0

Eligibility vs the studio thesis β€” a weighted Gate 0, then the verdict recorded on a signed DecisionReceipt. Two of the cycle's subjective-input channels live here: document upload and the question-gates (intake).

Venture Guide: This venture is building as planned β€” nothing needs you on this step.

Set what fits the thesis

T1

Set sector, model, market and ambition against the studio thesis.

Dogfood-demo: Clearly-labelled dogfood demo: the 6 companies (MyStdy Β· Servicely Β· DifferenZ Β· Exponic Β· Digna Β· Kollied) are companies Espen holds a stake in, used ONLY as demo data to exercise the engines β€” never as proof that venture building works. Every demo row is flagged dogfood and held out of every client-facing aggregate (DEL 98-3).

Scope

Sector Β· model Β· market Β· ambition (demo: Digna).

SectorData governance / AI trust
ModelB2B SaaS Β· regulated sector
MarketNordics β†’ EU (regulatory tailwind)
AmbitionStudio build β†’ Scaleup handover

Gate 0 β€” weighted suitability

5 criteria Γ— 0–5 Γ— weight β†’ 87/100. Bar: 65.

Ξ£ 39 / 45

Legal-form suitability (pre-incorporation ok)
5Γ—2=10
Stage fit (pre-seed/seed)
5Γ—2=10
Geography fit (Nordics)
4Γ—1=4
Ticket fit (studio band)
3Γ—1=3
Thesis alignment (studio mandate)
4Γ—3=12

Verdict β€” DecisionReceipt

Pass/fail + reason, signed (GATE0).

VerdictPASS β€” fits the studio thesisGate-0 score 87 β‰₯ 65
Signed byOwner β€” demoDecisionReceipt(GATE0) Β· who/when/verbatim
RationaleThesis-fit high; stage + geography within the mandate.

Suitability log

Read-only β€” no change expected here.

2026-06-18Scope saved
2026-06-19Gate 0 run β†’ PASS
2026-06-19Verdict recorded to DecisionReceipt(GATE0)
Proposed
Set sector, model, market and ambition against the studio thesis.
Live commit Β· demo store
TALK TO THE PROGRAM β€” about this sub-step